yunatel

Our brand-new Deepseek-based AI states "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl forecasts from our new Deepseek-based AI trained to be much better at forecasting

Share this post

No one can predict the future however at Lightning Rod Labs we are training AI to offer it its best shot. With approximately date news and a little but lively 14 Billion parameter design, our AI is boldly forecasting the unpredictable. Join us as we try to answer humankind's toughest concerns.

Super Bowl Sunday is nearly upon us and, simply as two years earlier, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the stats are well studied, wikitravel.org there remain lots of pushing concerns that are less easy to select. Our business, Lightning arrester Labs, has been mining questions from places like polymarket.com and training a large language design to be much better at anticipating the future (and have actually seen some appealing improvements - term paper inbound). Today we turned its cold, determining eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can provide us some insight into the finer points of what we can anticipate this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world register for my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion parameter design which is actually on the smaller sized side. (Some quotes recommend ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION parameters and trained utilizing 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, its knowledge cutoff is from numerous months ago so we have built an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each question we supply the news and watch as the AI reasons its way through unidentified area to make its finest prediction possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We positioned the following concerns to our AI and determined its response. While we have seen prediction improvements from our training, use these estimates for prop wagering at your own hazard.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% possibility

And so it appears this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI believes Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock strong, however a little too private for a post-Super Bowl proposal. Plus got ta aspect in if the Chiefs lose. That would be an uncomfortable proposal ...

First, I'll take a look at the crucial points from the articles. Travis has actually remained in a relationship with Taylor because 2023. He's a big football star, and she's been helpful of his career, attending his games. They seem to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has even invited her loved ones to the Super Bowl, revealing her commitment.

Some fans are delighted, while others, especially Swifties, are a bit uncertain, particularly given remarks Travis made about Donald Trump attending the Super Bowl. That has actually caused some Swifties to question how appropriate Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple appears to be keeping their relationship private and not dealing with the speculation straight.

I think the bottom lines are the speculation and his incredibly elusive responses. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an essential occasion, the odds and his actions suggest it's more of a possibility rather than a certainty. I 'd approximate a low probability, possibly around 5%, considering all factors.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the super bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% chance

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from using their signature "tush-push" move, now its simply a different front-tush being pressed. Will an AI comprehend what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even understand what a "tush" is? Will it factor in that the Chiefs stopped (controversy aside) Josh Allen's comparable attempts? Appears like our AI believes they'll be using Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again throughout this game.

Alright, I'm trying to find out the probability that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the Super Bowl. First, I need to understand what precisely a "tush-push" is. From the posts, it appears like it's a method where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, utilizes his legs and lower body strength to press off defenders. It's compared to pressing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs strength and method.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts uses his leg strength, having done a 600-pound squat, to execute the move. The article mentions that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this strategy, which is quite high. ... I likewise require to believe about the defensive methods of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs understand the Eagles' "tush-push" strategy, they might adjust their defense appropriately, which might either increase or decrease the variety of times the Eagles use it.

Considering that more than five appears like a significant number but possible provided their confidence, I would approximate a probability around 60-70% possibility. This represents their preparation, self-confidence in the method, and the likelihood that they'll use it a number of times, specifically if it works early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump during the halftime show performance?

AI Final Prediction: 65% opportunity

While our AI may not resemble us when it pertains to awareness, a soul, or any physical symptom, it certainly has opinions on Kendrick Lamar. It was quite uncertain, waffling back and forth, but in the end it believes Kendrick isn't going to back down from a battle.

From the articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of slamming Trump. He's done this in his songs, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a declaration throughout a previous halftime program when Trump existed in 2018. That appears significant because it shows he's done it before, so perhaps he'll do it again. But wait, taking a look at more recent short articles, it points out that Lamar is moving away from political statements and focusing more on personal expression. That could imply he's less likely to deal with Trump this time.

However, he's also associated with a fight with Drake, which may provide him reasons to make some public statements, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal concerns surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a defamation match from Drake, so possibly he's cautious about including any controversial tunes in the efficiency. But given that he won the Grammys for that track, he may still wish to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a prominent event, Lamar may feel forced to make a statement. However, the NFL tends to avoid political statements throughout the halftime show, so there's a risk that such material might be limited or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a track record of making vibrant relocations on huge stages. He's the first solo rap act to headline the halftime show, which might offer him more creative freedom. Plus, his past behavior suggests he's not shy about expressing his opinions, even in public performances.

But I likewise keep in mind reading that Lamar revealed fatigue about criticizing Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That might indicate he's less motivated to raise Trump this time around, especially if he's focusing on his feud with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past behavior, present shifts in focus, legal problems, and the occasion's context-the likelihood seems to be moderately high, perhaps around 65%.

Will Andy Reid eat a cheeseburger on screen after the very bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% opportunity

Lets be honest, Andy Reid loves cheeseburgers. And who doesn't? Will the truth that our AI has never tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its prediction? Looks like theres rather of a possibility that if the chiefs taste triumph, Andy will Beef.

From the articles, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid consuming a cheeseburger throughout a Super Bowl event. Bradshaw later said sorry for the joke, stating he didn't indicate to cause offense which he in fact discovered it humorous himself. Reid seemed to take it in stride, which may indicate he's the type to laugh it off instead of getting upset.

Taking a look at the short articles, it discusses that Andy Reid is a food enthusiast and enjoys cheeseburgers. There's a short article specifically about his love for food, which recommends that he's a person who takes pleasure in eating, particularly with his group. So, if there were strategies to celebrate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, specifically if the circumstance is on screen for an event.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% possibility

"Tails never fails?" You can't fool the makers !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have been anticipating the coin toss and 53% are forecasting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 very bowls. Potentially lucrative? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be deceived and thinks anything can occur when that coin goes in the air.

Okay, so I'm attempting to find out the likelihood that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I understand that a coin toss is expected to be 50/50, but there's some historical information that may affect this forecast.

First, I go through the short articles provided. They all mention the historic statistics of Super Bowl coin tosses. It looks like tails has actually turned up more frequently than heads traditionally. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has been the outcome 30 times, which has to do with 52%, while heads has been 28 times, which has to do with 48%. So, based purely on history, tails has a small edge, but it's not a huge distinction.

However, I remember that the result of a coin toss is typically thought about random. The minor historical edge for tails might be due to possibility. But when making forecasts, often individuals weigh historical information even if it's not statistically considerable. So, I need to think about whether this historical predisposition should affect the likelihood.

After believing about it, I decide that while the historical information reveals a small preference for tails, it's not statistically significant sufficient to move the likelihood far from 0.5. So, I'll choose 0.5 as the likelihood, acknowledging that the small historic edge exists but doesn't override the reality that each toss is an independent 50/50 occasion.

Will the referees cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% chance

We get it, you think the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I guarantee we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training information) I would most likely believe the exact same. BUT, its official now because our AI says the opportunities are only 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still kind of high when it pertains to fraud on a national scale). Looks like the Chiefs will need to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I'm trying to find out the possibility that the referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a quite major allegation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a great deal of articles that discuss conspiracy theories recommending referees are prejudiced towards the Chiefs. People are indicating some questionable contact current games, particularly the AFC Championship Game. That does seem to stimulate some uncertainty. I can see why fans might get annoyed when their group loses due to what they view as bad officiating.

But then I check out that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "unbelievable" and "outrageous." They state there's no proof of systematic bias. That's a strong statement from individuals in charge. If they're rejecting it, it may imply there's no real basis or they would have resolved it in a different way if there was some truth to it.

Taking a look at the posts, numerous sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the authorities are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They also discussed that analytical analysis doesn't reveal any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For instance, Mike Pereira from FOX said information shows the Chiefs have been penalized more since 2022. That's intriguing because if they were getting unique treatment, you might anticipate less charges, right?

...

So, putting it all together, the probability that referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is probably really low. Maybe not zero due to the fact that you can't rule out every possibility, however exceptionally not likely.

Summary

There you have it everyone, is it even worth seeing the game still? I think I'll need to wait and see how the game ends up before we release this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for a good video game! And hey, if it ends up our AI was wrong about whatever, a minimum of it can gain from this.